Recently I made the shift to freelancing full-time, and it’s led me to participate in a few online communities for entrepreneurs, freelancers, and small business owners. I've noticed a trend in the way many of them talk about SEO; specifically, the blocks they face in attempting to “do SEO” for their businesses. Again and again, the concept that "SEO is too hard to stay on top of... it’s always changing" was being stated as a major reason that people feel a) overwhelmed by SEO; b) intimidated by SEO; and c) uninformed about SEO.
And it’s not just non-SEOs who use this phrase. The concept of “the ever-changing landscape of SEO” is common within SEO circles as well. In fact, I’ve almost certainly used this phrase myself.
But is it actually true?
To answer that question, we have to separate the theory of search engine optimization from the various tactics which we as SEO professionals spend so much time debating and testing. The more that I work with smaller businesses and individuals, the clearer it becomes to me that although the technology is always evolving and developing, and tactics (particularly those that attempt to trick Google rather than follow their guidelines) do need to adapt fairly rapidly, there are certain fundamentals of SEO that change very little over time, and which a non-specialist can easily understand.
The unchanging fundamentals of SEO
Google’s algorithm is based on an academia-inspired model of categorization and citations, which utilizes keywords as a way to decipher the topic of a page, and links from other sites (known as “backlinks”) to determine the relative authority of that site. Their method and technology keeps getting more sophisticated over time, but the principles have remained the same.
So what are these basic principles?
It comes down to answering the following questions:
- Can the search engine find your content? (Crawlability)
- How should the search engine organize and prioritize this content? (Site structure)
- What is your content about? (Keywords)
- How does the search engine know that your content provides trustworthy information about this topic? (Backlinks)
If your website is set up to help Google and other search engines answer these 4 questions, you will have covered the basic fundamentals of search engine optimization.
There is a lot more that you can do to optimize in all of these areas and beyond, but for businesses that are just starting out and/or on a tight budget, these are the baseline concepts you’ll need to know.
Crawlability
You could have the best content in the world, but it won’t drive any search traffic if the search engines can’t find it. This means that the crawlability of your site is one of the most important factors in ensuring a solid SEO foundation.
In order to find your content and rank it in the search results, a search engine needs to be able to:
- Access the content (at least the pages that you want to rank)
- Read the content
This is primarily a technical task, although it is related to having a good site structure (the next core area). You may need to adapt the code, and/or use an SEO plugin if your site runs on Wordpress.
For more in-depth guides to technical SEO and crawlability, check out the following posts:
- Find Your Site's Biggest Technical Flaws in 60 Minutes - Moz blog
- SEO Tools to Analyze Your Site Like Google Does - Hubspot blog
- What Web Dev Taught Me About SEO - Distilled blog
Site structure
In addition to making sure that your content is accessible and crawlable, it's also important to help search engines understand the hierarchy and relative importance of that content. It can be tempting to think that every page is equally important to rank, but failing to structure your site in a hierarchical way often dilutes the impact of your “money” pages. Instead, you should think about what the most important pages are, and structure the rest of your site around these.
When Google and other search engine crawlers visit a site, they attempt to navigate to the homepage; then click on every link. Googlebot assumes that the pages it sees the most are the most important pages. So when you can reach a page with a single click from the homepage, or when it is linked to on every page (for example, in a top or side navigation bar, or a site footer section), Googlebot will see those pages more, and will therefore consider them to be more important. For less important pages, you’ll still need to link to them from somewhere for search engines to be able to see them, but you don’t need to emphasize them quite as frequently or keep them as close to the homepage.
The main question to ask is: Can search engines tell what your most important pages are, just by looking at the structure of your website? Google’s goal is to to save users steps, so the easier you make it for them to find and prioritize your content, the more they’ll like it.
For more in-depth guides to good site structure, check out the following posts:
- Information Architecture for SEO - Moz (Whiteboard Friday)
- How to Create a Site Structure That Will Enhance SEO - Kissmetrics blog
- How to Create a Site Structure Google Will Love - Wordtracker
- The SEO Benefits of Developing a Solid Site Structure - Search Engine Land
Keywords
Once the content you create is accessible to crawlers, the next step is to make sure that you’re giving the search engines an accurate picture of what that content is about, to help them understand which search queries your pages would be relevant to. This is where keywords come into the mix.
We use keywords to tell the search engine what each page is about, so that they can rank our content for queries which are most relevant to our website. You might hear advice to use your keywords over and over again on a page in order to rank well. The problem with this approach is that it doesn’t always create a great experience for users, and over time Google has stopped ranking pages which it perceives as being a poor user experience.
Instead, what Google is looking for in terms of keyword usage is that you:
- Answer the questions that real people actually have about your topic
- Use the terminology that real people (specifically, your target audience) actually use to refer to your topic
- Use the term in the way that Google thinks real people use it (this is often referred to as “user intent” or “searcher intent”).
You should only ever target one primary keyword (or phrase) per page. You can include “secondary” keywords, which are related to the primary keyword directly (think category vs subcategory). I sometimes see people attempting to target too many topics with a single page, in an effort to widen the net. But it is better to separate these out so that there's a different page for each different angle on the topic.
The easiest way to think about this is in physical terms. Search engines’ methods are roughly based on the concept of library card catalogs, and so we can imagine that Google is categorizing pages in a similar way to a library using the Dewey decimal system to categorize books. You might have a book categorized as Romance, subcategory Gothic Romance; but you wouldn’t be able to categorize it as Romance and also Horror, even though it might be related to both topics. You can’t have the same physical book on 2 different shelves in 2 different sections of the library. Keyword targeting works the same way: 1 primary topic per page.
For more in-depth guides to keyword research and keyword targeting, check out the following posts:
- More than Keywords: 7 Concepts of Advanced On-Page SEO - Moz blog
- Keyword Research in 2016: Going Beyond Guesswork - Moz blog
- Guide to Keyword Research - Backlinko
- Complete Guide to Keyword Research for SEO - SearchEngineWatch
Backlinks
Another longstanding ranking factor is the number of links from other sites to your content, known as backlinks.
It’s not enough for you to say that you’re the expert in something, if no one else sees it that way. If you were looking for a new doctor, you wouldn’t just go with the guy who says “I’m the world’s best doctor.” But if a trusted friend told you that they loved their doctor and that they thought you’d like her too, you’d almost certainly make an appointment.
When other websites link to your site, it helps to answer the question: “Do other people see you as a trustworthy resource?” Google wants to provide correct and complete information to people’s queries. The more trusted your content is by others, the more that indicates the value of that information and your authority as an expert.
When Google looks at a site’s backlinks, they are effectively doing the same thing that humans do when they read reviews and testimonials to decide which product to buy, which movie to see, or which restaurant to go to for dinner. If you haven’t worked with a product or business, other people’s reviews point you to what’s good and what’s not. In Google’s case, a link from another site serves as a vote of confidence for your content.
That being said, not all backlinks are treated equally when it comes to boosting your site’s rankings. They are weighted differently according to how Google perceives the quality and authority of the site that’s doing the linking. This can feel a little confusing, but when you think about it in the context of a recommendation, it becomes a lot easier to understand whether the backlinks your site is collecting are useful or not. After all, think about the last time you saw a movie. How did you choose what to see? Maybe you checked well-known critics’ reviews, checked Rotten Tomatoes, asked friends’ opinions, looked at Netflix’s suggestions list, or saw acquaintances posting about the film on social media.
When it comes to making a decision, who do you trust? As humans, we tend to use an (often unconscious) hierarchy of trust:
- Personalized recommendation: Close friends who know me well are most likely to recommend something I’ll like;
- Expert recommendation: Professional reviewers who are authorities on the art of film are likely to have a useful opinion, although it may not always totally match my personal taste;
- Popular recommendation: If a high percentage of random people liked the movie, this might mean it has a wide appeal and will likely be a good experience for me as well;
- Negative association: If someone is raving about a movie on social media and I know that they’re a terrible human with terrible taste... well, in the absence of other positive signals, that fact might actually influence me not to see the movie.
To bring this back to SEO, you can think about backlinks as the SEO version of reviews. And the same hierarchy comes into play.
- Personalized/contextual recommendation: For local businesses or niche markets, very specific websites like a local city’s tourism site, local business directory or very in-depth, niche fan site might be the equivalent of the “best friend recommendation”. They may not be an expert in what everyone likes, but they definitely know what works for you as an individual and in some cases, that’s more valuable.
- Expert recommendation: Well-known sites with a lot of inherent trust, like the BBC or Harvard University, are like the established movie critics. Broadly speaking they are the most trustworthy, but possibly lacking the context for a specific person’s needs. In the absence of a highly targeted type of content or service, these will be your strongest links.
- Popular recommendation: All things being equal, a lot of backlinks from a lot of different sites is seen as a signal that the content is relevant and useful.
- Negative association: Links that are placed via spam tactics, that you buy in bulk, or that sit on sites that look like garbage, are the website equivalent of that terrible person whose recommendation actually turns you off the movie.
If a site collects too many links from poor-quality sites, it could look like those links were bought, rather than "earned" recommendations (similar to businesses paying people to write positive reviews). Google views the buying of links as a dishonest practice, and a way of gaming their system, and therefore if they believe that you are doing this intentionally it may trigger a penalty. Even if they don’t cause a penalty, you won’t gain any real value from poor quality links, so they’re certainly not something to aim for. Because of this, some people become very risk-averse about backlinks, even the ones that came to them naturally. But as long as you are getting links from other trustworthy sources, and these high quality links make up a substantially higher percentage of your total, having a handful of lower quality sites linking to you shouldn’t prevent you from benefiting from the high quality ones.
For more in-depth guides to backlinks, check out the following posts:
Theory of Links
- All Links are Not Created Equal: 10 Illustrations on Search Engines' Valuation of Links - Moz blog
- What Links Comply with Google's Guidelines - Moz (Whiteboard Friday)
Getting More Links
- What Is Linkbuilding? - Moz (Beginner's Guide to SEO)
- High-Value Tactics, Future-Proof Link Building - Moz (Whiteboard Friday)
- How to Create Content That Keeps Earning Links (Even After You Stop Promoting It) - Moz blog
- Targeted Link Building in 2016 - Moz (Whiteboard Friday)
- 7 Easy Local Link Building Tactics - Whitespark blog
- Guide to Linkbuilding - Backlinko
Mitigating Risk of Links
- Step-by-step Guide to a Manual Backlinks Audit - Search Engine Land
- Link Audit Guide for Effective Link Removals & Risk Mitigation - Moz blog
- How to Conduct a Backlink Audit in 45 Minutes - Neil Patel
Does anything about SEO actually change?
If SEO is really this simple, why do people talk about how it changes all the time? This is where we have to separate the theory of SEO from the tactics we use as SEO professionals to grow traffic and optimize for better rankings.
The fundamentals that we’ve covered here — crawlability, keywords, backlinks, and site structure — are the theory of SEO. But when it comes to actually making it work, you need to use tactics to optimize these areas. And this is where we see a lot of changes happening on a regular basis, because Google and the other search engines are constantly tweaking the way the algorithm understands and utilizes information from those four main areas in determining how a site’s content should rank on a results page.
The important thing to know is that, although the tactics which people use will change all the time, the goal for the search engine is always the same: to provide searchers with the information they need, as quickly and easily as possible. That means that whatever tactics and strategies you choose to pursue, the important thing is that they enable you to optimize for your main keywords, structure your site clearly, keep your site accessible, and get more backlinks from more sites, while still keeping the quality of the site and the backlinks high.
The quality test (EAT)
Because Google’s goal is to provide high-quality results, the changes that they make to the algorithm are designed to improve their ability to identify the highest quality content possible. Therefore, when tactics stop working (or worse, backfire and incur penalties), it is usually related to the fact that these tactics didn’t create high-quality outputs.
Like the fundamentals of SEO theory which we’ve already covered, the criteria that Google uses to determine whether a website or page is good quality haven’t changed all that much since the beginning. They’ve just gotten better at enforcing them. This means that you can use these criteria as a “sniff test” when considering whether a tactic is likely to be a sustainable approach long-term.
Google themselves refer to these criteria in their Search Quality Rating Guidelines with the acronym EAT, which stands for:
- Expertise
- Authoritativeness
- Trustworthiness
In order to be viewed as high-quality content (on your own site) or a high-quality link (from another site to your site), the content needs to tick at least one of these boxes.
Expertise
Does this content answer a question people have? Is it a *good* answer? Do you have a more in-depth degree of knowledge about this topic than most people?
This is why you will see people talk about Google penalizing “thin” content — that just refers to content which isn’t really worth having on its own page, because it doesn’t provide any real value to the reader.
Authority
Are you someone who is respected and cited by others who know something about this topic?
This is where the value of backlinks can come in. One way to demonstrate that you are an authority on a topic is if Google sees a lot of other reputable sources referring to your content as a source or resource.
Trust
Are you a reputable person or business? Can you be trusted to take good care of your users and their information?
Because trustworthiness is a factor in determining a site’s quality, Google has compiled a list of indicators which might mean a site is untrustworthy or spammy. These include things like a high proportion of ads to regular content, behavior that forces or manipulates users into taking actions they didn’t want to take, hiding some content and only showing it to search engines to manipulate rankings, not using a secure platform to take payment information, etc.
It’s always the same end goal
Yes, SEO can be technical, and yes, it can change rapidly. But at the end of the day, what doesn’t change is the end goal. Google and the other search engines make money through advertising, and in order to get more users to see (and click on) their ads, they have to provide a great user experience. Therefore, their goal is always going to be to give the searchers the best information they can, as easily as they can, so that people will keep using their service.
As long as you understand this, the theory of SEO is pretty straightforward. It’s just about making it easy for Google to answer these questions:
- What is your site about?
- What information does it provide?
- What service or function does it provide?
- How do we know that you’ll provide the best answer or product or service for our users’ needs?
- Does your content demonstrate Expertise, Authoritativeness, and/or Trustworthiness (EAT)?
This is why the fundamentals have changed so little, despite the fact that the industry, technology and tactics have transformed rapidly over time.
A brief caveat
My goal with this post is not to provide step-by-step instruction in how to “do SEO,” but rather to demystify the basic theory for those who find the topic too overwhelming to know where to start, or who believe that it’s too complicated to understand without years of study. With this goal in mind, I am intentionally taking a simplified and high-level perspective. This is not to dismiss the importance of an SEO expert in driving strategy and continuing to develop and maximize value from the search channel. My hope is that those business owners and entrepreneurs who currently feel overwhelmed by this topic can gain a better grasp on the way SEO works, and a greater confidence and ease in approaching their search strategy going forward.
I have provided a few in-depth resources for each of the key areas — but you will likely want to hire a specialist or consultant to assist with analysis and implementation (certainly if you want to develop your search strategy beyond simply the “table stakes” as Rand calls it, you will need a more nuanced understanding of the topic than I can provide in a single blog post).
At the end of the day, the ideas behind SEO are actually pretty simple — it’s the execution that can be more complex or simply time-consuming. That’s why it’s important to understand that theory — so that you can be more informed if and when you do decide to partner with someone who is offering that expertise. As long as you understand the basic concepts and end goal, you’ll be able to go into that process with confidence. Good luck!
Great blog post! I agree, when people are trying to trick Google i think it is a stupid idea. Google are a multibillion pound company and are not stupid. There algorithm will eventually start being able to catch people out. At the end of the day most technology these days has some sort of Google application with it, with location settings and everything else that is about these days we don't know exactly what they are tracking. For all we know they could be tracking every gmail account and where it is etc...
"Hope this makes sense struggle at typing aha"
Maybe some day they will start filtering websites associated with google accounts which searched for terms like "how to do SEO" :D
hahaha but i wish they understand it after many years. currently we have already their 200 ranking factors for struggling.
Totally agree with you. If they didn't catch you out in the past, they will be able to catch you out in the future. The best SEO is the "natural" one.
Natural or White Hat SEO always pay result. It may take some time but it is always in your favour.
I think it's a really naive view that tricking Google is a 'stupid' idea. We live in a capitalist world and 'gaming' Google can be very lucrative to those who know exactly what they're doing. The algorithm can indeed catch people out on occasion but then the Black Hat community adapts and gets smarter - this is the whole point of churn and burn websites. Sometimes I feel sorry for ultra white hatters who are in denial that black hat exists and that black hat makes people a lot of money.
We are not ultra white haters, well i am not one anyway. I totally believe in PBN's but we can not use these for our client. I totally agree Ronnie. Just sharing my view.
Well you've said tricking Google is stupid and now you say you believe in PBNs?
I do think tricking Google is stupid because eventually they will catch us out, but we may as well use them now whilst they are working to make money. Just got to be careful on what sites we are linking them to, especially to reduce the risk of getting de-indexed.
The phrase "The more things change the more they stay the same" comes to mind. To me, SEO is still "Make great content, build great links" at the very core of it. The only thing that's changed is how to make great content and how to build good links (and what a good link is)
Exactly. SEOs say it's always changing so they can charge monthly retainers and make themselves relevant, ha.
Haha Ronnie, I almost used that phrase in the post. I agree completely, the thing that does change is the "how" - but the "what" and even the "why" are (historically at least) pretty static.
To me it all comes down to the KISS method of "keeping it stupid simple". You laid out the basic foundation for quality SEO and the ever changing landscape is a cross between people trying to overachieve with less work or not putting in enough work when doing it in the first place.
For example keeping your site crawable can come down to logical URL's that convey exactly what you saying and then reflecting that on the page through various H tags and content. That alone can help but then you go a step further and make sure the content is informative, not spammy, and can be used as an actual tool which then gives authority to your page and will attract backlinks organically.
To me this has been the end goal from day one but to do that takes work so people will place thin content, think that using deep linking through various channels is the only way to go, and then tell clients that they will rank.
Fantastic article and something that every marketer should know that as a foundation nothing changes but the tools to help us do our job are growing day by day.
This post is what anyone who wants to start a career in SEO, or really even dabbles in SEO, should read (and what I wish I would have a few years ago).
I feel too many people thing there's a special formula or secret to SEO success when really it's just about knowing the fundamentals and being the best content out there. The thing that takes time isn't uncovering some hidden treasure, but mastering the little things, whether they be technical-based or marketing-based.
Thanks Sam! Absolutely agree. The "silver bullet" is nice in theory, but in practice what gets results is consistent improvement of the basics. Of course there is always room for advanced tactics and tech once you have those fundamentals down, but so often people skip the basics in favor of the shiny new thing. It's like anything...consistency and practice (or in this case, solid optimization at the basic level) will win out over raw talent (or in this case, a shiny advanced tactic) every time.
The four links of the structure of the site leave 404 errors. You can check it since I find very interesting the post you have written.
It was my fault, the links are going well!
I’ve had times where my team spent months helping a client gain traction, only getting results after more than 90 days.
But I’ve also had clients see page 1 results at the top of the SERPs show up after just a few days and minor updates.
At the root of those major results? Better optimization, especially on mobile.
Thanks for your comment Kamal! It's amazing how sometimes we can get really significant results just from getting back to the basics.
Hi Bridget.
I think you're right - the basics are remarkably static. What people struggle to keep up with is the developments in the more advanced edge of the field.
In your areas:
I can totally see how this stuff would be difficult to keep up with - I find it hard enough and it's my full time job!
Hi Tom,
I agree with you as well, thanks for sharing your thoughts!
I would add the featured snippets. I was talking with one client about how Google will display (restaurant) menus directly in their Search, she did not imagine it was possible. When you are not in the field, it is difficult to keep up with the many ways you could be viewed.
Cheers,
Hi Tom, you're absolutely correct that the advanced tactics and technology are hard to stay on top of...that's why it's so important for there to be experts and specialists!
My point with this post is simply that you don't need to be an expert or a technical specialist in order to understand the theory behind *why* the experts are doing what they do. I've seen this idea that "SEO changes constantly" given as a reason for why people never even pick up a basic understanding of how Google works. It's almost always valuable to work with a specialist, but if you don't understand the most basic theory it's hard even to know who to hire, or what to hire them for.
In my mind, it's a little like going to the doctor...some things can be treated at home, a lot of things need the expert to diagnose and treat. But people who understand the basic mechanics of their own body will find it easier to explain to the doctor what they need (and even to know when it's time to go to the doctor, when they can do a home treatment, and when a proposed treatment sounds like quack medicine).
Have you been feeling overwhelmed or intimidated at the thought of trying to “learn SEO”? Did this overview help make things a little clearer? I’d love to hear from you in the comments!
No, I totally agree with what you say, it is more I share what you say, I would say that in former times it was much easier to do these steps.
Nice analysis on current seo trends. But in my view, Google algorithm now giving more weight for backlinks than the on-page content.
Outstanding article! There is a huge amount of excellent practical advice I’m going to implement in the next couple of days. If you are interested, I’ll report back on specific results
Thank-you so much. I follow this site avidly, and it has helped me tremendously.
It is interesting to value your market to draw a correct strategy. In our case we make SEO for three provinces related to the sector of the plagues. Interesting article. thanks for sharing.
As Google update their algorithm so the process of SEO are also change. We have to keep ourselves updated with its change. We need to learn the new tricks and also try to the fresh task for making a good impression from Google. So study online about the SEO regularly, will help us to be perfect for Search Engine Optimization.
Nice valuable tips regarding seo you are true that just stick to the basics and just focus on relvent and quality backlinks techniques by following the guidelines of google web masters . Now in modern seo quality link building is a right approach to safe your self from any penalties
Hi Bridget, thanks for resurfacing all the SEO basics and by reading this article it certainly was time worth spending.
Well just to mention, the deep keyword analysis is worth doing and wanted to know if there are any ways to get it done, as I got my company's digital marketing done from a agency named Inbics, they soley focused on ROI focused results but for my next focus project I wanted to be familiar with the basic of it before getting on with a agency.
Thanks.
Hi Bridget, great post, Thanks for sharing.
I have a blog for a year, with more than 200 articles, but I did not increase its organic traffic. I have performed several SEO audits and corrected some problems but the changes are not remarkable. What do you recommend me?
Thanks.
Nice Post!
And I agree, theres no point in using bad SEO techniques to gain quick and easy results as they will inevitably, if you're lucky disappear and if you're not, the site will disappear from the serps completely.
I believe that everyone can find a good keyword, make a site structure friendly for search engines and people, maintain a good page speed but noone can get dofollow links without burning their nights. I'm blogging for a long time,i share valuable contents which are getting a reasonable amount of visitors but still i have no dofollow links for my blog.
I get traffic because i depend on LSI keywords which tells search engines about my content meanings.
Hello Bridget -
You have written splendid informative blog. Many people doesn't even know that how much SEO can worth business (Website). In this blog, You have given overview of all valuable aspects for better ranking on search engine. I like you writing style simple but attracted.
Improvement:
- You didn't focused on User Experience. Doesn't elaborate it well enough. As we all know, UX and UI evolving the entire SEO parameters in upcoming time.
Great post!!. crawlability, keywords, backlinks - these 3 are the main important factors and these are never change.. only change some techniques like now a day require only quality content and quality back links not a require quantity. Some years ago many people doing quantity base submission and generate more back links but today's require only quality otherwise your website go to spam..
but i believe if you have a unique topic then you can rank well without having thouzands of backlinks
I agree with you.I recently launched a blog , Basicschoolnews . for someone who is just getting started with seo like myself, i must say the whole process is wholesome and complicated. I have even invested efforts into seo than many other aspect of my blog.
When i started, i almost paid for junk backlinks till i came across a post here about getting backlinks from authority websites and how poor website backlinks could harm your seo.
Thank you for this piece. I will definitel adopt it.
[Link removed by editor.]
Great article. You defined SEO in probably the most perfect way possible and clarified confusion on my part. Awesome work.
Great post Bridget!
It is clear that in SEO we have to update almost monthly, see if there are new techniques ...
A blog that we should not miss anyone in this community is the "Google blog" at webmaster-es.googleblog.com where we talk about updates or advice from Google itself.
A greeting!
Excellent information. Strong fundamentals of technical and On-Page SEO coupled with great content that is unique, useful and appeals to the audience of your website are the first and necessary steps for any website.
Another useful resource is https://moz.com/beginners-guide-to-link-building
Dear Bridget Randolph,
Thanks to sharing this info, but my question is that organic seo will dead in future ? because google updates indicate this...
Hi Manoj,
There are many different predictions about what might happen with SEO in the future...and many people more qualified than myself are trying to answer that question! My philosophy is that, while it is useful to be prepared for what might happen later, it is also important to focus on what is happening now. So far, the basic principles of SEO have remained the same since the beginning of Google...so I don't think we'll see that changing drastically in the near future. As I said in the post, the technology and tactics will certainly change, but the end goal so far has always been the same.
Great article, you are absolutely right and that is why seo is not a simple task, not only worth getting backlinks, but that the ones you get have to be very related to your web page or your ecommerce.
The conclusion is that the seo does not change, but if it has changed, since before was not so priority that a backlink tubiera to see with your web or your ecomerce however now if it has to see.
Great article and very instructive.
Nice post, you are right. Technical SEO needs to be strong on your website. then you will get little smother of your offpage activites
Yes, SEO is always changing because Google update SEO algorithm regularly. Also site ranking depend on it.
Beautifully eloquent! Bridget.
It shows that we are in a healthy industry with a strong evolution in the learning space.
Hi ,,,,,,
Very nice post as usual.
Thanks for sharing this post.
Regards
kristen